<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Cruickshank&#8217;s Adventures in Architecture: Death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Anthony</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18961</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/#comment-18961</guid>
		<description>I have been trying to find out for many years who is responsible, the producer, the director, can&#039;t be the cameraman, for documentaries going out of their way NOT to show the subject matter.

Take the Maps docu.-I know intimately the contours of the presenter&#039;s face but can I study for a few seconds the microsecond glimpses of the maps themselves - no chance. When a map is shown (usually a moving image at a low angle }and I begin to focus on it, it&#039;s back on the presenter&#039;s face again my eyes being fooled again and again. Even if the maps are shown for a few seconds the camera is always moving so if  an item seems interesting it quickly disappears off screen. What is the point of repeatedly  showing a  complete  map (British Isles eg), even on a 17&quot; screen, when only the outline of the country is recognisable? 
We know what the presenter looks like from the beginning and he/she should only reappear at the end or when introducing a guest speaker. Don&#039;t show him to us looking at the object, describing it when it is not shown to the viewer to be studied.
You docu. makers should have a message shown at the start saying, &quot;If you wish to see the subjects under discussion record this programme on a video hard drive so that images can be paused for study otherwise it won&#039;t be worth watching&quot;.
This post applies to 99% of docus. don&#039;t you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to find out for many years who is responsible, the producer, the director, can&#8217;t be the cameraman, for documentaries going out of their way NOT to show the subject matter.</p>
<p>Take the Maps docu.-I know intimately the contours of the presenter&#8217;s face but can I study for a few seconds the microsecond glimpses of the maps themselves &#8211; no chance. When a map is shown (usually a moving image at a low angle }and I begin to focus on it, it&#8217;s back on the presenter&#8217;s face again my eyes being fooled again and again. Even if the maps are shown for a few seconds the camera is always moving so if  an item seems interesting it quickly disappears off screen. What is the point of repeatedly  showing a  complete  map (British Isles eg), even on a 17&#8243; screen, when only the outline of the country is recognisable?<br />
We know what the presenter looks like from the beginning and he/she should only reappear at the end or when introducing a guest speaker. Don&#8217;t show him to us looking at the object, describing it when it is not shown to the viewer to be studied.<br />
You docu. makers should have a message shown at the start saying, &#8220;If you wish to see the subjects under discussion record this programme on a video hard drive so that images can be paused for study otherwise it won&#8217;t be worth watching&#8221;.<br />
This post applies to 99% of docus. don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Could anyone inform me on the music used in this (&quot;Death&quot;) episode? Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could anyone inform me on the music used in this (&#8220;Death&#8221;) episode? Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bowbrick</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bowbrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/2008/04/10/dan-cruickshanks-adventures-in-architecture-death/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I really like the random collision of kooky eccentric architectural historian Banham and golly gosh eccentric architectural historian Cruickshank. They don&#039;t have much else in common, I suppose. Both great communicators, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the random collision of kooky eccentric architectural historian Banham and golly gosh eccentric architectural historian Cruickshank. They don&#8217;t have much else in common, I suppose. Both great communicators, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

