<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hole in the Wall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo Reynolds - Links for 2008-09-22</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo Reynolds - Links for 2008-09-22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/?p=160#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>[...] Charlie Brooker&#8217;s screen burn &#124; Culture &#124; The Guardian - &#8220;But really, so what? We&#8217;ve been here before. It&#8217;s basically a Nintendo version of It&#8217;s A Knockout. And, what&#8217;s more, once you factor in the knowledge that the contestants are competing for charity, it looks less like the death of civilisation and more like a daft game at a village fete, writ large. This is TV blowing off and giggling for 30 unrelenting minutes.&#8221; [I wrote my own review last night at watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Charlie Brooker&#8217;s screen burn | Culture | The Guardian &#8211; &#8220;But really, so what? We&#8217;ve been here before. It&#8217;s basically a Nintendo version of It&#8217;s A Knockout. And, what&#8217;s more, once you factor in the knowledge that the contestants are competing for charity, it looks less like the death of civilisation and more like a daft game at a village fete, writ large. This is TV blowing off and giggling for 30 unrelenting minutes.&#8221; [I wrote my own review last night at watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roo</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/?p=160#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Wow. I totally missed that. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Precedence&lt;/a&gt; is important, and is totally overlooked. How infuriating. Maths teachers across the country will be quite rightly sharpening their letter-writing pencils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I totally missed that. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations" rel="nofollow">Precedence</a> is important, and is totally overlooked. How infuriating. Maths teachers across the country will be quite rightly sharpening their letter-writing pencils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bowie</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/?p=160#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just rewatched that bit of the show and the question was in fact:

3 x 12 + 8 / 4 = ?

It still should be 38 and not 11...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just rewatched that bit of the show and the question was in fact:</p>
<p>3 x 12 + 8 / 4 = ?</p>
<p>It still should be 38 and not 11&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bowie</title>
		<link>http://watchification.com/2008/09/21/hole-in-the-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchification.com/?p=160#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Grammar&#039;s one thing but they got the maths completely wrong.

In a round where one team had to answer a &quot;question&quot; they were presented with something like this (I can&#039;t remember precisely):

4 x 9 + 8 / 4

The two options were 11 and 12. But neither was right. The contestants plumped for 11 as reading left to right that appears correct.

But as anyone who studied GCSE (or in my case O level) maths should know, multiplications and divisions should be carried out first and in my, possibly misremembered example, the answer is actually 38.

If I actually felt it was worth complaining to someone, I would!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammar&#8217;s one thing but they got the maths completely wrong.</p>
<p>In a round where one team had to answer a &#8220;question&#8221; they were presented with something like this (I can&#8217;t remember precisely):</p>
<p>4 x 9 + 8 / 4</p>
<p>The two options were 11 and 12. But neither was right. The contestants plumped for 11 as reading left to right that appears correct.</p>
<p>But as anyone who studied GCSE (or in my case O level) maths should know, multiplications and divisions should be carried out first and in my, possibly misremembered example, the answer is actually 38.</p>
<p>If I actually felt it was worth complaining to someone, I would!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

